Solar Radiation Management (SRM): A Grave Ethical Error (13 June 2024; Horton & Kieth/Harvey/Gardiner)
In this essay, I will argue that the pursuit of Solar Radiation Management (SRM), a form of geoengineering proposed to combat climate change, is unethical and should be avoided. To support my argument, I’ll reference Gardiner’s “Geoengineering and Moral Schizophrenia,” Horton & Kieth’s “Solar Geoengineering and Obligations to the Global Poor,” and Chelsea Harvey’s “Geoengineering Is Not a Quick Fix for the Climate Crisis.” First, I’ll introduce Gardiner’s piece, particularly focusing on the concepts of “moral schizophrenia” and ethical shortsightedness. Her work will be foundational for the next part of my essay where I introduce Horton and Kieth’s essay; I’ll dismantle their arguments in favor of SRM and accept their challenge to “demonstrate that SRM would violate principles of global… justice.” Having introduced the philosophical texts, I’ll use Harvey’s piece to explain the hazards of SRM to aid in my discourse. By critically analyzing the arguments in favor of SRM, I’ll sho...